Main Article Content
Aims: This study aims to assess the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of various measurement methods of stress radiographs in PCL insufficiency.
Study Design: Descriptive study.
Place and Duration of Study: Department of Orthopaedics, at Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok between December 2015 and June 2016.
Methodology: Three measurement methods including Mid-Mid Method, Blumensaat's Line-Posterior Tibia Method and Blumensaat's Line-Anterior Tibia Method were employed. Each technique performed twice by two orthopaedic surgeons. Patients were assessed at day 0 and at 4 weeks. Intrarater and interrater reliability of measurements in PCL Radiographs were observed.
Results: The findings indicate that the Blumensaat's line-posterior tibia method showed the highest intraobserver reliability. For intrarater agreement, each method produced high correlation (r > 0.9) at both week 0 and 4. Regarding interrater agreement between two surgeons, high correlation (r > 0.8) was found in Mid-Mid Method and Blumensaat's Line-Posterior Tibia Method, while the Blumensaat's Line-Anterior Tibia method gave medium level of correlation (r=0.528-0.675). Both surgeons indicated similar results for each pair of measurement. The Mid-Mid Method and Blumensaat's Line-Posterior Tibia Method showed positive correlation of measurement. Mid-Mid Method and Blumensaat's Line-Anterior Tibia Method, and Blumensaat's Line-Posterior Tibia Method and Blumensaat's Line-Anterior Tibia Method showed negative correlation of measurement.
Conclusion: The Blumensaat's line-anterior tibia method produced the highest intraobserver and interobserver reliability in measuring stress radiographs in posterior cruciate ligament insufficiency.
Margheritini F, Mancini L, Mauro CS, Mariani PP. Stress Radiography for Quantifying Posterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(7):706-11.
Srisuwanporn P, Wachiratarapadorn S, Panyasakulwong R, Thuntong B, Cheecharern S, Precha W. Accuracy of a New Stress Radiographic Device in Diagnosing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear. J Med Assoc Thai. 2016;99(4):394- 399.
Cheecharern S, Panyasakulwong R, Laksawut S, Lorpongpaiboon C, Thuntong B, Srisuwasnporn P, et al. Correlation between a stress radiographic device and MRI in posterior cruciate ligament tears. J Med Assoc Thai. 2019;102(3):291-7.
Jackman T, LaPrade RF, Pontinen T, Lender PA. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the kneeling technique of stress radiography for the evaluation of posterior knee laxity. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(8):1571–6.
Schulz MS, Russe K, Lampakis G, Strobel MJ. Reliability of stress radiography for evaluation of posterior knee laxity. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:502-6.
Wirz P, von Stokar P, Jakob RP. The effect of knee position on the reproducibility of measurements taken from stress films: A comparison of four measurement methods. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8:143-8.
Jacobsen K. Stress radiographical measurements of post-traumatic knee instability: A clinical study. Acta Orthop Scand. 1977;48:301-10.
Staubli HU, Jakob RP. Posterior instability of the knee near extension: A clinical and stress radiographic analysis of acute injuries of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72(2):225-30.
Hewett TE, Noyes FR, Lee MD. Diagnosis of complete and partial posterior cruciate ligament ruptures: Stress radiography compared with KT-1000 arthrometer and posterior drawer testing. Am J Sport Med. 1997;25:648-55.
Daniel DM, Stone ML, Barnett P, Sachs R. Use of the quadriceps active test to diagnose posterior cruciate-ligament disruption and measure posterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988; 70(3):386-91.
Lee YS, Han SH, Jo J, Kwak KS, Nha KW, Kim JH. Comparison of 5 different methods for measuring stress radiographs to improve reproducibility during the evaluation of knee instability. Am J Sport Med 2011;39(6):1275-81.